Quarterly Money Market Fund Commentary
December 31, 2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fa7c/0fa7c2ff07a9e8b02e412f66ef86ae3824fc7bd3" alt="Business Man Financial Inspector And Secretary Making Report, Calculating Or Checking Balance. Inter business man financial inspector and secretary making report calculating or checking balance. Internal Revenue Service inspector checking document. Audit concept"
First American Money Market Funds
What market conditions had a direct impact on the bond market this quarter?
Economic Activity – The fourth quarter (Q4) closed out a strong year for the U.S. economy with economic activity continuing to exceed expectations and growing at an above-trend pace throughout the year. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) is projected to grow near 2.5% for Q4 amid still-firm domestic demand and consumer spending. Personal consumption remained healthy throughout the quarter as growing real wages and household wealth helped offset persistent headwinds from elevated prices and high interest rates. Labor market data was volatile during the quarter due to hurricane and strike-related impacts, but overall conditions suggest a resilient market that continues to normalize with stable hiring activity and low numbers of layoffs. November U.S. job openings rose modestly to 8.1 million open positions, while total unemployed workers in the labor force as of December were unchanged at 6.9 million. Monthly non-farm payrolls (NFP) growth remains healthy, averaging 170,000 during Q4 and the U3 unemployment rate was 4.1% in December, matching the level from September. Average hourly earnings growth is off its highs but remains solid at 3.9% year-over-year (YoY). The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased to 2.7% in November versus 2.4% in September reflecting an uptick in energy prices. Core inflation’s downward momentum stalled during the quarter with CPI ex- food and energy rising 3.3% YoY in November, consistent with the pace in September. The Federal Reserve’s (Fed) preferred inflation index – the PCE Core Deflator Index – increased 2.8% YoY in November. The path back to the Fed’s 2% inflation target remains elusive as minimal progress has been made to curtail elevated core services prices. While recent easing pressures within shelter costs offer an encouraging sign, the Fed is becoming increasingly wary of inflation risk leading to the potential for a longer pause in rate cuts to start the new year.
Monetary Policy – The Fed lowered its federal funds target range twice during the quarter, by 25 basis points (bps) at both the November 7 and December 18 meetings, ending the year at 4.25% to 4.50%. The Fed’s post-meeting statement was little changed in December, only adding “the extent and timing” of additional rate moves will be based on the incoming data, the evolving outlook, and the balance of risks. The Fed also continues to implement its balance sheet reduction program (quantitative tightening), with a monthly cap of $25 billion in Treasury securities and $35 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities. The December rate cut was viewed as a “hawkish cut” by market participants with the Fed appearing to lay the groundwork for a slower pace of policy easing, including an anticipated pause at the upcoming meeting in January.
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) released its updated Summary of Economic Projections at the December meeting which indicates additional rate cuts are coming, but later than previously forecast. The median projection for the federal funds rate at the end of 2025 was revised higher to a range of 3.75% to 4.0%, signaling 50 bps of rate cuts during the year versus 100 bps previously. The median dots show further rate cuts of 50 bps in 2026 and 25 bps in 2027, and the estimated longer-run neutral rate was increased to 3.0% (previously 2.875%). The FOMC’s economic projections were revised to show higher expected core inflation in 2025 (2.5% vs. 2.2%) and 2026 (2.2% vs. 2.0%) compared to the prior release while revisions to GDP growth and unemployment forecasts were minimal. While the economic projections and dot plot are helpful in determining committee member’s current expectations, we do not put too much stock in them as evolving economic conditions can quickly render them out-of-date. Additionally, the timing and economic impact from the incoming Trump Administration’s policies on taxes, regulations, tariffs, and immigration will have an influence on the path of monetary policy in 2025.
Fiscal Policy – In an all too familiar scene, the federal government once again narrowly avoided a shutdown near the end of December, with Congress passing a continuing resolution to fund government operations at existing spending levels through March 14. The spending bill also included $100 billion in disaster and $30 billion in agricultural aid but did not include an extension of the debt ceiling, a late request by incoming President Trump. The debt ceiling, which was reinstated January 1, 2025, is not expected to become a binding issue until later in the year as the Treasury can use extraordinary measures and incoming tax receipts to continue funding the government over the near-term. The next year is anticipated to be an active period for fiscal policy. In addition to passing an annual budget and addressing the debt ceiling, legislation surrounding tax cuts and areas of spending reduction are expected to be high on the agenda for the new Congress and incoming Administration. On the municipal side, strong stock market performance in 2024 along with solid sales and property tax collections will aid state and local government budgets. As federal COVID money runs out, municipal entities that aligned the one-time revenues with one-time expenses will fare better than those that spent it on reoccurring expenditures.
Credit Markets – The three-month to 10-year portion of the U.S. Treasury yield curve steepened a hefty 109.1 bps in the quarter, as short rates fell on two 25 bps Fed rate cuts and long-rates moved higher on markets reducing the number of expected Fed rate cuts and growing skepticism over future progress on inflation. The yield curve shift resulted in the first positively shaped curve since Q4 2022. The severe yield curve steepening resulted in short duration strategies outperforming longer duration strategies. Lower-rated credit spreads outperformed their higher-rated counterparts.
Yield Curve Shift
U.S. Treasury Curve |
Yield Curve 9/30/2024 |
Yield Curve 12/31/2024 |
Change (bps) |
---|---|---|---|
3 Month |
4.617% |
4.314% |
-30.3 |
1 Year |
4.002% |
4.143% |
14.1 |
2 Year |
3.641% |
4.242% |
60.1 |
3 Year |
3.549% |
4.273% |
72.4 |
5 Year |
3.558% |
4.382% |
82.4 |
10 Year |
3.781% |
4.569% |
78.8 |
Duration Relative Performance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0177/f017758e6550531fd4aa292701b364bb5ec0eb1d" alt="Duration Relative Performance Duration Relative Performance"
*Duration estimate is as of 12/31/2024
For the year, the three-month to ten-year portion of the yield curve steepened 170.8 bps, with three-month yields falling just over 100 bps and ten-yield yields rising 69 bps. The severe steepening pivoted around the two-year yield which ended 2024 only 0.8 bps lower than the end of 2023.
Credit Spread Changes
ICE BofA Index |
OAS* (bps) 9/30/2024 |
OAS* (bps) 12/31/2024 |
Change (bps) |
---|---|---|---|
1-3 Year U.S. Agency Index |
3 |
4 |
1 |
1-3 Year AAA U.S. Corporate and Yankees |
7 |
14 |
7 |
1-3 Year AA U.S. Corporate and Yankees |
26 |
30 |
4 |
1-3 Year A U.S. Corporate and Yankees |
50 |
49 |
-1 |
1-3 Year BBB U.S. Corporate and Yankees |
80 |
75 |
-5 |
0-3 Year AAA U.S. Fixed-Rate ABS |
58 |
38 |
-20 |
Option-Adjusted Spread (OAS) measures the spread of a fixed-income instrument against the risk-free rate of return. U.S. Treasury securities generally represent the risk-free rate.
Corporate credit spread performance diverged in the quarter, with higher quality issuers widening and BBB credit spreads tightening. Neither move was significant, but did result in solid outperformance for BBB corporates versus corporates in the AAA-A rated category. ABS spreads outperformed all corporate investment-grade sectors by tightening 20 bps in the quarter.
Credit Sector Relative Performance of ICE BofA Indexes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f33ae/f33aec43f0165d13ae640322d482db817c412f6e" alt="Duration Relative Performance Duration Relative Performance"
*Data is as of 12/31/2024
ICE BofA Index
*AAA-A Corporate index outperformed the Treasury index by 8.6 bps.
*AAA-A Corporate index underperformed the BBB Corporate index by 27.6 bps
*U.S. Financials outperformed U.S. Non-Financials by 3.0 bps
Given the jump in longer rates, absolute performance in longer fixed income indices was muted. AAA-rated ABS was the only notable outperformer, driven by the healthy 20 bps tightening in credit spreads. BBB credit outperformed the AAA-A-rated category on higher coupon income and better spread performance in the quarter.
What were the major factors influencing money market funds this quarter?
The fourth quarter of 2024 witnessed a continuation of the Fed’s easing cycle, with rates lowered 25 bps at both the November 7 and December 18 Fed meetings, setting the federal funds target range to 4.25%-4.50% by year-end. Following the soft September jobs report, labor and inflation data firmed, softening the pace and expectation of additional rate cuts. The markets now indicate one additional 25 bps cut in 2025 as confidence in economic growth, employment and inflation stubbornness persist. There are varying opinions on the timing, depth and pace of future rate activity and the Fed will remain data-dependent. The challenge for managers will be determining how the economic, inflation and employment data will influence FOMC action.
Industry-wide, money market fund assets increased during the quarter as short-term yields continued to attract investors. Money market funds remain a viable option relative to other short-term cash equivalent options.
First American Prime Obligations Funds
Credit conditions and trading ranges appear stable, given the current rate environment. Given the yield curve and our conservative cash flow approach, the First American Funds were positioned with strong portfolio liquidity metrics influenced by Fund shareholder makeup. We continued to employ a heightened credit outlook, maintaining positions presenting minimal credit risk to the Fund’s investors. During the fourth quarter, our main investment objective was to maintain liquidity while opportunistically enhancing portfolio yield, with a combination of fixed and floating-rate securities, based on our economic, credit and interest rate outlook. We believe the credit environment and higher relative fund yields make the sector an appropriate short-term option for investors.
First American Government and Treasury Funds
As the Fed continued its easing cycle, money market funds moved into defensive mode to preserve yields in the face of falling rates. Managers extended durations, investing in longer-term securities to get ahead of a forecasted lower yield environment. With Quantitative Tightening and increasing debt needs, repo supply remained plentiful, which put marginal upward pressure on repo and secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) yields. These market dynamics support a more barbell investment strategy. For MMF investors, funds’ extension into lower-yielding long-term securities puts marginal downward pressure on portfolio yields. However, the slowing pace of Fed activity and flat yield curve should mute the downward pressure on front-end rates and ultimately should slow the decline in money market fund yields. Strategically, when presented with appropriate value, managers purchased floating-rate investments anticipated to benefit shareholders over the securities holding period. Our investment strategy will be fluid in the coming quarters as we determine the Fed’s comfort level with inflation and, ultimately, the timing and pace of future rate moves.
First American Retail Tax Free Obligations Fund
While the Federal Reserve has lowered rates by 100 bps since September, the immediate impact on tax exempt money market yields was modest through December. Comparing the average rates for SIFMA in Q3 versus Q4, we see a decline of only 10 bps. This seemingly muted reaction is partially attributed to the richer/lower variable rate demand notes (VRDN) levels experienced during the summer, when reinvestment demand from bond maturities and coupon payments was strong. Increasing volumes of new issuance in the broader municipal market just before the election boosted early fourth quarter VRDN resets as investors required cash to cover these bond settlements. SIFMA spiked higher again late in the year, reflecting the motivations of broker/dealers to keep inventories light. VRDNs have moved significantly lower to start 2025, which we anticipated based on municipal bond seasonal patterns, including heavy reinvestment from maturities and coupon payments in January and February. This outlook for lower VRDN rates shaped our strategies toward a portfolio with higher fixed-rate investment allocations, and a longer weighted average maturity (WAM) relative to our competitors.
What near-term considerations will affect fund management?
Industry-wide, prime fund yields will gradually decline as managers roll maturities into lower-yielding securities that are pricing in future rate cuts. Compression in credit spreads will also narrow SOFR floating rate coupons, putting marginal downward pressure on portfolio yields. However, front-end yields in credit securities should continue to benefit from the overall supply of Treasury securities, as well as the potential impacts of a smaller prime money market fund universe creating competition among credit issuers for the marginal dollar. Based on our market outlook and breakeven analysis, we will seek to capitalize on investment opportunities that make economic sense in the coming quarters. We believe the Institutional and Retail Prime Obligations Funds will remain reasonable short-term investment options for investors seeking higher yields on cash positions while assuming minimal credit risk.
Yields in the government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) and Treasury space will decline in concert with additional anticipated Fed rate cuts. As with non-government debt, government and Treasury fund yields will continue to gradually decline as managers roll maturities into securities with lower yields that are pricing in future rate reductions. Managers will defend against future cuts by extending to optimal spots on the curve relative to Fed rate forecasts, policy impacts and market volatility. We anticipate some moderate yield dislocations in Treasury, GSE and repo issues as Treasury supply fluctuates. We note that with the failed extension of the debt ceiling extraordinary measures will be implemented, reducing Treasury bill issuance until a resolution is reached. A supply decrease in Treasury bill issuance will put temporary downward pressure on Treasury bill yield and, ultimately, Government and Treasury Money Market Funds. However, in general, with a resolved/extended debt ceiling policy and the continuation of quantitative tightening, we believe Treasury bill yield should remain attractive. Any large supply changes in Treasury issuance may create yield volatility and opportunities on the front end as the forces of supply and demand seek optimization. We will continue to seek value in all asset classes and exploit market conditions that support domestic and global economic outlooks.
For more information about the portfolio holdings, please visit
https://www.firstamericanfunds.com/index/FundPerformance/PortfolioHoldings.html
Sources
Bloomberg
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/monetary20241107a1.pdf
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/monetary20241218a1.pdf
https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/fomcprojtabl20241218.pdf
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-congress-trump-elon-musk/